I’m not sure I could’ve been more disappointed.
The concept of the book is to draw parallels between the
setting and activities of the era (which is an undetermined amount of time in
the future), to modern day meta-data mining- and to point a finger at the many
ways we are each controlled by major corporations. Control is possible because nearly everyone has
an implanted chip that allows a constant stream of data to be visualized or
listened to by the individual. Personalized data on what to buy and where to
visit is delivered to anyone with a “feed”- while awake, while asleep, while
eating, while thinking (or not thinking as is more likely for the majority of
characters.)
All of this seems intriguing, and to be honest I’ve found
myself contemplating the possibilities and implications of being connected to
my own feed, yes…that mysterious monster Facebook. How did they know to
recommend I friend someone from my early teen years, who I haven’t seen in 15
years?
The problem I have with the book is that it is a young adult
novel. I am a highly introspective 37
year old woman who obsessively looks for meaning in all that I do and read and
watch on TV. The complexities of created
language (such as ‘going mal’- something reminiscent of getting stoned through
an overload on the feed, ‘unit’- an insult or an exclamation of awesomeness, ‘meg
brag’- a descriptor of how very high end an item is) and the seemingly dangling
details of a civilization that has nearly destroyed itself, left me feeling
that a teenager reading this book would quickly put it down.
It is no Divergent, and certainly no Hunger
Games, where the dystopian nature of our future is explained just
enough to make teens angry and just enough to draw them in farther. Those pieces gave enough background and
uncovered enough detail to start discussions, to start arguments, to cause
anyone of any age to easily make connections to the life they are living right
now. The
Feed does not do any of these things.
Today I saw my nephew, the one reading this book along with
me. I asked him what he
thought. His response? “It’s stupid…the
description on the back made it look really interesting, but it’s not.” This comes from the mouth of a very normal
teenage boy. He’s athletic, thoughtful, volunteers his time for others, and he totally
missed any possible point. It’s just as I feared. There isn’t enough relatable material for
teens to make sense of the analogy.
So to M.T. Anderson, I say this: you missed the mark. There were missed opportunities; you could’ve done so much more with this piece. You missed a chance to give me a sensational, award winning, heart pounding, anger inducing, dystopian novel. Instead, you gave me…meh.